|
Below are photo credits 1-18.
For credits
19-36 go to FAQs page,
lower left. |
| Photo |
Caption |
Credit |
| Home 1 |
Last puzzle piece |
John Foxx |
| Home 2 |
Abstract stock chart |
Photodisc |
| Home 3 |
Financial collage |
I Image |
| About 4 |
Man supported |
Photodisc |
| About 5 |
World Currency |
Jason Reed |
| About 6 |
Currency Impression |
Medio Images |
| About 7 |
Time is Money |
John Foxx |
| About 8 |
Ronnie Moas |
Continental |
| Serv 9 |
Asian Currencies |
Digital Vision |
| Serv 10 |
Bank Note |
Medio Images |
| Serv 11 |
Wall Street |
John Foxx |
| Serv 12 |
Men on trading floor |
Photodisc |
| Perf 13 |
Chemist |
Julie Delton |
| Perf 14 |
Plugging in light |
Photodisc |
| Perf 15 |
Track montage |
John Foxx |
| Perf 16 |
Precision montage |
Digital Vision |
| Meth 17 |
Female Mathematician |
Susan Farrington |
| Meth 18 |
Child and chalkboard |
Photodisc |
|
|
|
 Archives |
| |
| This page is outdated and being updated. It will be refreshed on or before July 15, 2010. For the time being, for sample reports, see the ‘samples’ and ‘services’ pages.
|
| |
The first link is to a six-page excerpt from a 58-page report we wrote on large-caps in November 2001. In that report, we forecasted a 14.19% drop in the Nasdaq from 1841 to 1580. Within six months, that forecast was realized and by September 2002, we had already dropped below 1200! At the time, it was a very bold prediction to make, because the Nasdaq had already dropped more than 60% off the high. In that report, we recommended selling 70 of the Nasdaq-100 stocks. There were 15 stocks rated Hold and 15 rated Buy.
Archives: REPORT # 1 Word format November 2001
61,056 Bytes (59.6 KB) |
 |
|
| |
|
This 3800-row spreadsheet is from November 2005. It is currently being updated. The new document will be posted here in February 2007. The spreadsheet tracked performance of top scoring stocks from all reports generated by our computer model for the two-year period ending June 30, 2005. Excluding duplicates, there were 789 Buy recommendations for the respective period. For documentation purposes, all recommendations remain open.
More than 60% of the computer-generated recommendations beat their benchmark. The out-performance in basis points on the out-performing recommendations was double the under-performance in basis points on the under-performing recommendations. The improvement with the subjective overlay was significant. See the performance page for the tracker of those recommendations.
Archives: REPORT # 2 Excel format July 2003-June 2005
921,088 Bytes (899 KB) |
|
| |
The third link is to an excerpt from the 148-page report we distributed on August 23, 2004. The report covered the 400 largest ADRs. In that report, you can see we were one of the first firms on Wall Street looking overseas for undervalued stocks. At the time, it was considered a risky strategy and not popular. Shortly thereafter, many analysts started jumping on the bandwagon. The attached file is the scoring summary from that 400-stock report. Had you invested an equal amount of money into each of the top 40 your return through 09.30.06 would have been 48.88%. 17 of the top 40 stocks rose by more than 60%, including 7 that were up by more than 100%. Only three stocks dropped by more than 20%.
Archives: REPORT # 3 Excel format August 2004
339,968 Bytes (332KB) |
 |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
